Value for Tuesday of Week 25 in the season of Ripening

Being Intellectually Excellent

Each of us is challenged to make the most of our natural intellectual potential.

  • I distrust the rash optimism in this country that cries, “Hurrah, we’re all right! This is the greatest nation on earth,” when there are grievances that call loudly for redress. That is false optimism. Optimism that does not count the cost is like a house builded on sand. A man must understand evil and be acquainted with sorrow before he can write himself an optimist and expect others to believe that he has reason for the faith that is in him.  [Helen Keller, “Optimism” (1903), Part i.]
  • The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function. [F. Scott Fitzgerald]
  • It is good to rub and polish our brain against that of others. [attributed to Michel de Montaigne]
  • Intelligence is the ability to adapt to change. [attributed to Stephen Hawking]
  • . . . the brain is like a muscle. When it is in use we feel very good. [Carl Sagan]

Human progress is attributable not only to the rare geniuses who have revolutionized intellectual life, science and technology but also to the journeymen who have used their considerable talents to apply knowledge in their communities. For example, brilliant researchers discover new medicines, and communities rely on doctors to use those medications. People routinely make fun of lawyers, until they need one. Despite unfortunate strains of anti-intellectualism in many societies, people turn to those who have developed their talents and abilities through study and practice, in ways that exceed the grasp of average members of the community.

Intelligence is the ability to learn from experience and to adapt to, shape, and select environments.” It can also be defined as “a general mental ability for reasoning, problem solving, and learning. Because of its general nature, intelligence integrates cognitive functions such as perception, attention, memory, language, or planning.” It is not strictly a personal trait but is also a function of tasks and interactions.

Intelligence is positively associated with prosocial behavior, and leadership. “People with high IQs seem to be at an advantage in coping with traumatic events . . .”

Some scholars argue that intelligence enhances social learning. Others argue that it contributes to creativity and innovation. Others argue that it is of benefit in the arts

These claims are entirely consistent with each other. Nine kinds of intelligence have been identified. Only some of them are highly valued in society, including our economic system. “. . . poor perception of intelligence, rooted in historical realities, means that it will continue to be misunderstood, feared, and misused, limiting how effective it could be in helping to close gaps in achievement and in creating a more equitable society.

Real

True Narratives

The writings of intellectually advanced people serve as narratives of their developed gifts.

Diaries of Susan Sontag, who stood apart from “other two-handers, like Norman Mailer, Joan Didion, James Baldwin and Gore Vidal (in) her worship of intellectualism as a goal in itself.”

Books about intelligent people:

Technical and Analytical Readings

From the dark side:

Photographs

Documentary and Educational Films

Imaginary

Fictional Narratives

By the side of Enjolras, who represented the logic of the Revolution, Combeferre represented its philosophy. Between the logic of the Revolution and its philosophy there exists this difference--that its logic may end in war, whereas its philosophy can end only in peace. Combeferre complemented and rectified Enjolras. He was less lofty, but broader. He desired to pour into all minds the extensive principles of general ideas: he said: "Revolution, but civilization"; and around the mountain peak he opened out a vast view of the blue sky. The Revolution was more adapted for breathing with Combeferre than with Enjolras. Enjolras expressed its divine right, and Combeferre its natural right. The first attached himself to Robespierre; the second confined himself to Condorcet. Combeferre lived the life of all the rest of the world more than did Enjolras. If it had been granted to these two young men to attain to history, the one would have been the just, the other the wise man. Enjolras was the more virile, Combeferre the more humane. _Homo_ and _vir_, that was the exact effect of their different shades. Combeferre was as gentle as Enjolras was severe, through natural whiteness. He loved the word _citizen_, but he preferred the word _man_. He would gladly have said: _Hombre_, like the Spanish. He read everything, went to the theatres, attended the courses of public lecturers, learned the polarization of light from Arago, grew enthusiastic over a lesson in which Geoffroy Sainte-Hilaire explained the double function of the external carotid artery, and the internal, the one which makes the face, and the one which makes the brain; he kept up with what was going on, followed science step by step, compared Saint-Simon with Fourier, deciphered hieroglyphics, broke the pebble which he found and reasoned on geology, drew from memory a silkworm moth, pointed out the faulty French in the Dictionary of the Academy, studied Puységur and Deleuze, affirmed nothing, not even miracles; denied nothing, not even ghosts; turned over the files of the _Moniteur_, reflected. He declared that the future lies in the hand of the schoolmaster, and busied himself with educational questions. He desired that society should labor without relaxation at the elevation of the moral and intellectual level, at coining science, at putting ideas into circulation, at increasing the mind in youthful persons, and he feared lest the present poverty of method, the paltriness from a literary point of view confined to two or three centuries called classic, the tyrannical dogmatism of official pedants, scholastic prejudices and routines should end by converting our colleges into artificial oyster beds. He was learned, a purist, exact, a graduate of the Polytechnic, a close student, and at the same time, thoughtful "even to chimæras," so his friends said. He believed in all dreams, railroads, the suppression of suffering in chirurgical operations, the fixing of images in the dark chamber, the electric telegraph, the steering of balloons. Moreover, he was not much alarmed by the citadels erected against the human mind in every direction, by superstition, despotism, and prejudice. He was one of those who think that science will eventually turn the position. Enjolras was a chief, Combeferre was a guide. One would have liked to fight under the one and to march behind the other. It is not that Combeferre was not capable of fighting, he did not refuse a hand-to-hand combat with the obstacle, and to attack it by main force and explosively; but it suited him better to bring the human race into accord with its destiny gradually, by means of education, the inculcation of axioms, the promulgation of positive laws; and, between two lights, his preference was rather for illumination than for conflagration. A conflagration can create an aurora, no doubt, but why not await the dawn? A volcano illuminates, but daybreak furnishes a still better illumination. Possibly, Combeferre preferred the whiteness of the beautiful to the blaze of the sublime. A light troubled by smoke, progress purchased at the expense of violence, only half satisfied this tender and serious spirit. The headlong precipitation of a people into the truth, a '93, terrified him; nevertheless, stagnation was still more repulsive to him, in it he detected putrefaction and death; on the whole, he preferred scum to miasma, and he preferred the torrent to the cesspool, and the falls of Niagara to the lake of Montfaucon. In short, he desired neither halt nor haste. While his tumultuous friends, captivated by the absolute, adored and invoked splendid revolutionary adventures, Combeferre was inclined to let progress, good progress, take its own course; he may have been cold, but he was pure; methodical, but irreproachable; phlegmatic, but imperturbable. Combeferre would have knelt and clasped his hands to enable the future to arrive in all its candor, and that nothing might disturb the immense and virtuous evolution of the races. _The good must be innocent_, he repeated incessantly. And in fact, if the grandeur of the Revolution consists in keeping the dazzling ideal fixedly in view, and of soaring thither athwart the lightnings, with fire and blood in its talons, the beauty of progress lies in being spotless; and there exists between Washington, who represents the one, and Danton, who incarnates the other, that difference which separates the swan from the angel with the wings of an eagle. [Victor Hugo, Les Misérables (1862), Volume III – Marius; Book Fourth – The Friends of the A B C, Chapter I, “A Group which barely missed becoming Historic”.]

Other novels:

Poetry

Music: Composers, artists, and major works

Frederic Mompou’s piano music (approx. 284’) is consistently thoughtful. “Mompou’s œuvre is small but immensely personal, containing mostly piano miniatures and songs as well as several choral works.His work “is radically simple, spare, mystical, and utterly unclassifiable as to style—all this in a century that favored intellectual feats on the part of composers who classified themselves into schools and 'isms.'” Highly reviewed albums of Mompou’s piano music are Paul Crossley, “The Sad Smile” (2025) (72’), and Arcadi Volodos, “Volodos Plays Mompou” (2013) (63’). His longer works for piano, and albums of his piano music, are:

Iannis Xenakis was a “Romanian-born French composer, architect, and mathematician who originated musique stochastique, music composed with the aid of electronic computers and based upon mathematical probability systems.” “Although few could claim to understand his complex, mathematically derived music theories, the avant-garde composer's prodigious output, technological innovation, and acclaim in the world of modern classical music gave him fame that few other contemporary composers could match.” “As of 1988, Xenakis (was) the author of just over one hundred works, utterly distinctive in style, yet always testimony to inner restlessness, to a need to be ‘on the move’. His works include:

Karl Amadeus Hartmann composed with intellectual subtlety in opposition to Nazism. “Although Hans-Werner Heister alludes to Hartmann's brief involvement in an underground anti-fascist network, Hartmann scholarship for the most part constructs arguments of inner emigration and resistance in terms of a paradigm of aesthetic communication, one of 'writing between the lines'. “A number of Hartmann’s compositions show the profound effect of the political climate.These include his early symphonies:

Other works:

Today, we have the thinking person’s pianist, Alfred Brendel. He has made leading recordings of many great works, mainly from the Classical and early Romantic eras.

Albums:

Music: songs and other short pieces

Visual Arts

Film and Stage

latest from

The Work on the Meditations