Value for Sunday of Week 27 in the season of Ripening

Being Open

Konstantin Somov, Open Door on a Garden (1934)

To receive the world and everything it has to offer, we must be open.

  • When the flower opens, the bees will come. [variously attributed]
  • Optimism . . . is a fact within my own heart. But as I look out upon life, my heart meets no contradiction. The outward world justifies my inward universe of good. All through the years I have spent in college, my reading has been a continuous discovery of good. In literature, philosophy, religion and history I find the mighty witnesses to my faith. [Helen Keller, “Optimism” (1903), Part ii.]
  • Nothing is more dangerous than a dogmatic worldview – nothing more constraining, more blinding to innovation, more destructive of openness to novelty. [Stephen Jay Gould]
  • The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness. [attributed to Niels Bohr]
  • The spirit of jazz is the spirit of openness. [Herbie Hancock]

For many, spirituality may already have begun to emerge, or may have emerged long ago. For others, an additional distinction may not yet have emerged clearly.

Early on, we identified willingness as sine qua non to ethical, moral, spiritual or for that matter virtually any kind of personal development. Later, we found through painful experience that we had a startling capacity for self-deception and needed the distinction of honesty to break through barriers that impeded our progress. This week, we focus on the distinction of openness, the final element in the holy trinity of honesty, openness and willingness (HOW), transformed into WHO in order of development.

You may ask how openness differs from willingness. These are only words we use to describe distinctions we make as we learn to identify, categorize and work with an ever-expanding set of life experiences. In essence, though, the distinction proposed between willingness and openness is that the former is a precursor to the latter: the former cracks the door open a bit, mainly through the emotion that we call willingness, while the latter throws the door wide open in all three domains of emotion, thought and action. With that introduction, enjoy the music, art and readings on the global subject of openness and then prepare for an exploration of this essential spiritual virtue in each of the three domains of Being.

Imaginary

Fictional Narratives

Novels:

Poetry

Books of poetry:

Music: Composers, artists, and major works

Maurice Ravel, Piano Concerto in G major, M. 83 (1931) (approx. 21-25’) (list of recorded performances), is an example of a person from one culture opening to another culture. On its own terms, the work is dreamy and romantic, evoking someone in love. However, it seems quirky in places. Ravel, who was French, drew heavily on George Gershwin and American jazz in this and other compositions. “It is . . . easy to hear the concerto as a sort of musical self-portrait, a manifesto of Ravel’s artistic aims and beliefs”, which had been shaped by listening carefully to and appreciating the work of others from outside his immediate circle. “After months of careful planning, Maurice Ravel embarked on a 4-month tour of North America in 1928. In all, he visited 25 cities coast-to-coast, and performed and conducted the leading orchestras of Canada and the Unites States. Ravel also made tourist visits to Niagara Falls and the Grand Canyon, and he was fascinated by the dynamism of American life. He admired 'the huge cities, skyscrapers, and its advanced technology, and was impressed by its jazz, Negro spirituals, and the excellence of American orchestras.'” “Several of Ravel’s works, notably his Piano Concerto in G Major, make use of jazz rhythms, ‘blue’ notes, and other features of American vernacular style. The first movement of Ravel’s concerto (composed in 1931) is in several respects a remarkable sequel to Gershwin’s Rhapsody in Blue (1924) and Concerto in F Major (1925). The frenetic rhythm patterns and Ravel’s ‘bluesy’ main theme in this movement bear an uncanny resemblance to Gershwin’s adaptations of the jazz idiom.” Top recorded performances on disc are by, Monique Haas (Schmidt-Isserstedt) in 1948, Michelangeli (Gracis) in 1958, Katchen (Kertész) in 1966, Argerich (Abbado) in 1967, Collard (Maazel) in 1979, Zimerman (Boulez) in 1998, Moravec (Bělohlávek) in 2004, Li (Ozawa) in 2007, Parker (Francis) in 2010, Grosvenor (Judd) in 2012, Piemontesi (Nott) in 2022, Tiberghien (Roth) in 2022, Poizat (Menezes) in 2024, and Son (Bihlmaier) in 2025.

Other jazz-influenced compositions include:

Earle Brown, Four Systems (1954) (approx 10-46’) is the embodiment of being open — Brown coined the term "open form" to name exactly what the work does, replacing the closed prescription of conventional notation with a graphic field of possibilities that stays receptive to whatever the performer brings to it. The score is open to any instrumentation, any duration, any sequence, any orientation (the page itself can be rotated and reordered), and any realization, treating each performance as a genuine encounter rather than the reproduction of a fixed object.

In Ann Arbor, Michigan, from 1961 through 1966, a group of independent free-thinking musical composers put together a yearly ONCE festival to explore expansion of musical boundaries. These efforts have resulted in a 5-CD compilation of forward-looking music (373’). To most people, this music remains obscure but it is well worth seeking out, both on its own terms, and also to illustrate the virtue of openness. Selections from these composers, not necessarily represented at the ONCE Festivals or even of those vintages, are linked below.

Albums:

Music: songs and other short pieces

Visual Arts

Film and Stage

latest from

The Work on the Meditations